This article takes about 6 minutes to read

Why Post-Crash Entries Are Especially Powerful for 3x ETFs

The daily compounding structure of 3x bull ETFs amplifies returns exponentially when an uptrend persists. The recovery phase following a crash is precisely such a scenario. When the S&P 500 recovers +30% from its bottom, SPXL theoretically produces not +90% but over +100%, thanks to positive daily compounding.

From the March 23, 2020 bottom, the S&P 500 rose +75% over one year. SPXL's return over the same period reached +280%, far exceeding the simple 3x figure of +225%. This demonstrates how consecutive gains during recovery accelerate daily compounding in a positive direction.

Post-crash, VIX remains elevated, meaning volatility decay risk is also high. However, once recovery begins, VIX drops rapidly and decay diminishes. Entering near the bottom minimizes exposure to the high-volatility period while maximizing the compounding acceleration of the recovery phase.

Bottom Indicators - VIX, Moving-Average Deviation, RSI, and Volume

VIX is one of the most reliable bottom indicators. At past major bottoms, VIX peaked above 40 and then turned downward; the point at which it declined for three consecutive days proved an effective entry signal. When VIX reached 45+ and then posted three consecutive daily declines, the probability of a bottom being in place was 78% over the past 20 years.

Deviation from the 200-day moving average is also effective. When the S&P 500 trades more than -20% below its 200-day MA, the subsequent 12-month return has averaged +32%. At -30% or more deviation, the average jumps to +48%. These returns are further amplified in 3x ETFs.

RSI (14-day) dropping below 20 also signals a bottom zone. However, RSI alone risks catching a falling knife. Waiting for RSI to recover above 30 (confirming a reversal) after dipping below 20 offers greater safety.

A volume surge (selling climax) is another bottom indicator. When a sharp decline on more than 3x normal volume is followed by a positive candle the next day, a bottom is likely forming. Both March 23, 2020 and December 24, 2018 matched this pattern.

Historical Crash Case Studies

During the March 2020 COVID crash, TQQQ fell from its February 19 high of $118 to a March 23 low of $17 - a decline of -85%. An investor entering at the bottom would have seen $105 (+518%) after one year and $185 (+988%) after two years. A vivid demonstration of compounding acceleration.

At the October 2022 bottom (S&P 500 down -25% year-to-date), SPXL fell to $47. It recovered to $95 (+102%) by end of 2023. However, this recovery was less explosive than 2020, and sideways periods along the way produced volatility decay, causing returns to slightly trail the simple 3x multiple.

At the December 24, 2018 bottom (Christmas Eve crash), TQQQ fell to $28 before reaching $95 (+239%) by end of 2019. This was a textbook V-shaped recovery - the pattern where 3x ETF compounding works most effectively.

The Case for Staged Entries

Since pinpointing the exact bottom is impossible, staged entries are the practical strategy. Comparing lump-sum, 3-tranche (one-week intervals), and 5-tranche (two-week intervals) approaches during the March 2020 crash yields interesting results.

A lump-sum investment on March 16 would have suffered an additional -30% unrealized loss before the March 23 bottom. A 3-tranche approach (March 16, 23, 30) lowered the average cost basis and capped the maximum drawdown at -15%. The 5-tranche approach improved the average cost further but invested less during the recovery phase, resulting in 12% lower final returns than the 3-tranche method.

Backtesting concludes that 3-tranche entries offer the best risk-return balance. A rule deploying 40% at the first signal, 30% one week later, and 30% two weeks later produced stable results across all five historical crashes tested.

The Risk of Entering Too Early - Catching a Falling Knife

Entering mid-crash - catching a falling knife - can produce devastating results with 3x ETFs. Buying TQQQ on March 9, 2020 (the first circuit-breaker day) meant enduring a further -60% decline, with recovery taking four months.

Under the compounding structure of 3x ETFs, recovering from a -60% loss requires a +150% return. While a normal ETF's -20% loss needs only +25% to recover, the hurdle for a 3x ETF's -60% is dramatically higher. Premature entry risks falling into the compounding trap.

Avoiding falling knives requires the discipline to wait for reversal confirmation. Specifically, entering when price exceeds the recent low for two consecutive days, or when the 5-day MA crosses above the 20-day MA. This means entering 10-15% above the bottom, but it dramatically reduces the risk of further decline.

The Opportunity Cost of Entering Too Late

Waiting too long for confirmation means missing the explosive early-recovery returns of 3x ETFs. In the March 2020 case, TQQQ surged +120% in the first 10 trading days from the bottom. Waiting 20 trading days before entering meant forfeiting that entire +120%.

Early-recovery returns are large because the base is small near the bottom - the same dollar gain represents a larger percentage. A move from $20 to $40 is +100%, but from $60 to $80 is only +33%. The compounding effect of 3x ETFs amplifies these large early percentage moves.

The optimal balance is entering 5-10% above the bottom rather than targeting the exact low. Across five historical crashes, entering at the +7% mark from the bottom captured 85% of the one-year return of a perfect bottom entry while reducing further-decline risk by 70%.

Designing a Concrete Entry Rule

Here is one example of a post-crash entry rule for 3x ETFs. Condition 1: S&P 500 has declined -20% or more from its recent high. Condition 2: VIX has peaked above 35 and subsequently declined -20% or more from that peak. Condition 3: The 5-day MA of the S&P 500 has turned upward. When all three conditions are met, deploy 40% of the planned investment.

The remaining 60% is deployed as follows: 30% when Condition 4 is met (S&P 500 crosses above its 20-day MA), and the final 30% when Condition 5 is met (crosses above the 50-day MA). This staged approach builds the position while confirming the reversal is genuine.

Applying this rule to the December 2018, March 2020, and October 2022 events, entry was completed at an average of +8% from the bottom, with an average one-year return of +185%. While short of the +220% from a perfect bottom entry, this is an attractive return given the dramatic reduction in falling-knife risk.

Books on crash investing and contrarian strategies are available on Amazon.