Comparing 20 Major 3x ETFs Side by Side - Expense Ratios, Decay Rates, Max Drawdowns, and Recovery Periods

This article takes about 6 minutes to read

Basic Specs of 20 Major 3x ETFs

While dozens of 3x leveraged ETFs are listed, approximately 20 are practical from a liquidity and AUM perspective. Bull products: TQQQ (NASDAQ100), UPRO (S&P 500), SOXL (semiconductors), TNA (Russell 2000), FAS (financials), TECL (technology), FNGU (FANG+), NAIL (homebuilders), DPST (regional banks), TMF (long-term treasuries), LABU (biotechnology), CURE (healthcare).

Bear products: SQQQ (NASDAQ100 inverse), SPXS (S&P 500 inverse), TZA (Russell 2000 inverse), FAZ (financials inverse), TMV (treasury inverse), SOXS (semiconductor inverse), LABD (biotech inverse), ERX (energy bull 3x).

Expense ratios generally fall within 0.90-1.01%. ProShares (TQQQ, SQQQ, UPRO, SPXS) charges 0.88-0.95%; Direxion (SOXL, TNA, FAS, NAIL, etc.) charges 0.94-1.01%. The difference is approximately 0.1% annually, negligible compared to volatility decay.

Annual Volatility Decay Rate Comparison

Volatility decay rates can be estimated from base index volatility. The approximation formula is: annual decay rate = -9 x sigma^2 x 252 / 2 (where sigma is daily volatility). Here are the daily volatilities and estimated annual decay rates for each ETF's base index.

Low decay group (under -10% annually): UPRO/SPXS (S&P 500, sigma=1.0%, decay -11%), TMF/TMV (long-term treasuries, sigma=0.9%, decay -9%). Medium decay group (-15 to -25%): TQQQ/SQQQ (NASDAQ100, sigma=1.4%, decay -22%), FAS/FAZ (financials, sigma=1.3%, decay -19%). High decay group (over -25%): SOXL/SOXS (semiconductors, sigma=1.8%, decay -37%), TNA/TZA (Russell 2000, sigma=1.3%, decay -19%), LABU/LABD (biotech, sigma=2.0%, decay -45%).

These decay rates represent 'annual loss in a flat market.' Products like LABU with -45% estimated annual decay require the base index to rise over +15% annually just to maintain positive long-term returns. From a compound interest perspective, decay rate is the single most important metric for leveraged ETF selection.

Maximum Drawdown Rankings (Past 10 Years)

Ranking maximum drawdowns (peak-to-trough decline) over the past 10 years: 1st LABU -99.5% (2021 peak to 2022 trough), 2nd DPST -92% (2022 to 2023 SVB crisis), 3rd SOXL -90% (2021 to 2022), 4th FNGU -88% (2021 to 2022), 5th TNA -85% (2018 to March 2020).

Relatively 'better' products: UPRO -76% (March 2020), TMF -73% (2022), FAS -70% (March 2020). Products with maximum drawdowns exceeding -90% effectively mean 'near-total loss is possible.' Recovering from -90% requires +900% return, taking 3-5 years even with 3x leverage.

Inverse ETF drawdowns approach -100% by definition (they inevitably decay long-term). SQQQ, SPXS, and TZA have all recorded cumulative losses exceeding -99% since inception, making long-term holding effectively impossible.

Drawdown Recovery Period Comparison

Recovery period (days to return to previous highs) from maximum drawdown tests investor patience. TQQQ: recovered from March 2020's -70% in approximately 6 months. SOXL: has not recovered from 2022's -90% as of June 2024 (approximately 2 years elapsed). UPRO: recovered from March 2020's -76% in approximately 8 months.

Recovery periods depend heavily on the base index's long-term return. TQQQ, based on NASDAQ100 (annual +12%), recovers quickly. TNA, based on Russell 2000 (annual +7%), takes longer. Sector ETFs (SOXL, NAIL, DPST) have uncertain recovery due to sector-specific factors.

From a compound interest perspective, volatility decay continues during recovery periods. This means even when the base index returns to its prior level, the leveraged ETF has not. TQQQ is typically still -20 to -30% below its prior peak when NASDAQ100 fully recovers. Complete recovery requires the base index to rise further.

Liquidity Rankings and Transaction Costs

Liquidity (daily volume) directly impacts transaction costs. Higher volume means tighter bid-ask spreads and less slippage on large orders. Top 5 by liquidity: TQQQ (100M+ shares daily), SQQQ (80M), SOXL (50M), UPRO (30M), SPXS (20M).

Low-liquidity products: NAIL (1M shares), DPST (500K), CURE (300K), LABU (2M). For these, orders exceeding $1 million may experience 0.5-1% slippage. Since transaction costs accumulate in short-term trading, prioritize high-liquidity products.

Bid-ask spread benchmarks: TQQQ under 0.01%, SOXL 0.02%, UPRO 0.02%, NAIL 0.05-0.10%, DPST 0.10-0.20%. Spreads are paid round-trip, so for frequent traders, annual costs become non-trivial.

Sector Characteristics Matrix

Organizing each sector across four axes: long-term trend, volatility, rate sensitivity, and economic sensitivity. Technology (TQQQ, TECL): strong long-term uptrend, high volatility, medium rate sensitivity, medium economic sensitivity. Semiconductors (SOXL): strong long-term uptrend, extremely high volatility, medium rate sensitivity, high economic sensitivity.

Financials (FAS, DPST): weak long-term uptrend, medium volatility, extremely high rate sensitivity, high economic sensitivity. Housing (NAIL): medium long-term trend, high volatility, extremely high rate sensitivity, high economic sensitivity. Bonds (TMF, TMV): long-term trend depends on rate environment, medium volatility, extremely high rate sensitivity, medium economic sensitivity.

The most suitable for long-term holding are sectors with 'strong long-term uptrend and relatively low volatility.' By this criterion, UPRO (S&P 500) offers the best balance, followed by TQQQ (NASDAQ100). Sector ETFs should be limited to short-to-medium-term tactical use.

Recommendations by Investment Objective

For short-term trading (days to weeks): TQQQ, SQQQ, SOXL, SOXS. High liquidity, tight spreads. High volatility provides sufficient returns even short-term. Good compatibility with technical analysis.

For medium-term holding (months): UPRO, TQQQ, TMF (during cutting cycles), TMV (during hiking cycles). Clear long-term trends in base indices mean returns can exceed volatility decay over several months. However, always remain aware of trend reversal risk. ETF investing introductory guides are strongly recommended as foundation before advancing to leveraged ETFs.

For hedging purposes (short-term only): SQQQ, SPXS, TZA. Use for temporary protection of existing positions. Maximum holding period: 2 weeks. Beyond that, put options are more efficient.

Core Principles of 3x ETF Investing

First principle: understand volatility decay. 3x ETFs do not deliver '3x the base index return' over the long term. They deliver 3x daily, and compounding causes long-term returns to diverge from 3x. This divergence always works in the negative direction.

Second principle: strictly manage position size. 3x ETFs should be limited to 10-20% of total portfolio. Committing all assets to a product that can realistically experience -80% drawdowns is gambling, not investing.

Third principle: never hold inverse ETFs long-term. Bull products can potentially ride long-term uptrends, but bear products are mathematically incapable of long-term holding. Use inverse ETFs only as short-term tools lasting days to weeks.

Fourth principle: verify liquidity. Niche sector ETFs have low liquidity and widening spreads during crashes. Since transaction costs accumulate, prioritize high-liquidity products (TQQQ, SOXL, UPRO).

Fifth principle: make compound mathematics your ally. A leveraged ETF's long-term return is a function of the base index's return and volatility. The mathematical condition for long-term profit with a 3x ETF is mu > 3*sigma^2/2 (return exceeds volatility decay). Choose base indices that satisfy this condition.